CI/CD Comparison

JenkinsvsGitHub Actions

Compare Jenkins and GitHub Actions for CI/CD

🏆 Winner: GitHub Actions for GitHub users

Head-to-Head Comparison

33% Market Share

Jenkins

Best For:

Self-hosted flexibility

Pricing:

Free (self-hosted)

Strengths
  • • Industry-leading features
  • • Proven enterprise adoption
  • • Strong ecosystem support
Limitations
  • • Learning curve considerations
  • • Pricing at scale
  • • Integration requirements
20% Market Share

GitHub Actions

Best For:

GitHub integration

Pricing:

2000 minutes free

Strengths
  • • Modern architecture
  • • Developer experience
  • • Innovation velocity
Limitations
  • • Maturity considerations
  • • Ecosystem size
  • • Enterprise features

How to Choose

Choose Jenkins if you need:

  • Self-hosted flexibility
  • Established ecosystem and community support
  • Proven enterprise track record

Choose GitHub Actions if you need:

  • GitHub integration
  • Modern development experience
  • Specific technology stack alignment

Need Help Choosing Between Jenkins and GitHub Actions?

Our veteran-led team has deep expertise in both platforms. Get personalized recommendations based on your specific requirements, budget, and technical constraints.

Jenkins vs GitHub Actions Detailed Comparison

When comparing Jenkins and GitHub Actions, it's important to consider your specific use case, budget, team expertise, and long-term technology strategy.

Jenkins Overview

Jenkins excels at Self-hosted flexibility. With 33% market share and pricing at Free (self-hosted), it's a strong choice for organizations that need established solutions with proven track records.

GitHub Actions Overview

GitHub Actions is best for GitHub integration. With 20% market share and pricing at 2000 minutes free, it offers compelling advantages for teams that value modern architecture and developer experience.